I Have A PETA For You Right Here
It was a tension-filled week, when it appeared as though
the Islamic Republic of Iran was ready to self-destruct at any moment. (It did.
The mainstream media obviously thought this story had
“legs” (fly legs, unfortunately, but not wings). The Obama sycophants saw this moment as proof
that the man who sank the three-pointer on camera in When the media began contacting us in droves for a
statement, we obliged, simply by saying that the president isn't the Buddha and
shouldn't be expected to do everything right—if not for that, we would not have
brought it up. It's the media who are making a big deal about the fly swat—not
PETA.
Once PETA bit on the bait by taking a stand on this
issue, it put itself in the crosshairs for ridicule. Ms. Mullins of PETA saw fit to use the
opportunity for promotion of the “humane insect catcher” by actually sending
one of these devices to The White House, as a suggested alternative to
fly-swatting. Ms. Mullins reported that
she once used one of these devices to “capture and release” a palmetto
bug. I believe that these $8 devices are
absurdly stupid and inefficient. Look at their ad for the thing. Do you really
believe that it’s possible to catch a fly with one of these? On more than one occasion, I was able to
catch a palmetto bug by merely sliding a piece of paper under it. I walked it to my porch and released it back
into the wild, where it was likely eaten by a cat. Palmetto bugs are slow, pathetic, helpless
things. The trap sold by PETA holds the
palmetto bug in an oppressive Plexiglas prison until you bother to release
it. By using a single sheet of paper
(costing $7.999 less) you can talk to the palmetto bug and nurture it as you return
it to its natural habitat.
On the other hand, I don’t necessarily agree with all the
people who are dumping on PETA. Although
it is true that Alisa Mullins of PETA referred to this event as “Flygate”, she
is probably too young to remember that Bill Clinton already had such a scandal. I agree with protecting animals to a
reasonable extent. I was a vegetarian
for two years. I also believe that PETA
has had some nice advertising campaigns that they lacked the guts to stand
behind. Take for example their Super Bowl ad that was banned. It showed some
steamy-hot women getting erotic with vegetables, using the sloagan: “Studies
show: Vegetarians have better sex”. Better yet, was their campaign for vegetarianism wherein two sexy women, dressed in lingerie, got cozy with each
other on an air mattress, to demonstrate how vegetarians can be sexy
people. Do you really believe that I’m
going to just tell you about this and not provide a link? Guess again.
The link is here. The mistake
PETA made involved locating this event
in
As you can see, PETA has used some mighty-fine ideas in
promoting its cause. The only problem
was that they caved in to intimidation.
As for The Obama Moment in fly-swatting, they may want to go back to the
well if they want to capitalize on it.
Why not shoot a commercial in an apartment where two hot women live, with
lots of Georgia O’Keeffe prints all over the walls? They would have the place loaded with plants, some
of which are called: Venus Fly Traps. Flies come in … and they get eaten by those
plants. Although some proponents of
“flies’ rights” might complain that plants are being used to kill insects
… That is simply unfair. Those plants have a right to defend
themselves from unwanted invaders. If
the flies are so obnoxious as to get themselves killed in the process, that’s
their problem. Case (and Venus Fly Trap)
closed.




Comments